On the latest press release from the church

I haven’t updated or posted this blog in over a year. I thought that this space would evolve over time and become whatever its supporters needed it to be. However, participation and maybe interest kind of dwindled and I ended up just leaving it here. Yesterday, though, I came across a post that was written for the Feminist Mormon Housewives blog and it brought me back here to reevaluate. The post discusses the church’s latest press release on the Effectiveness of Church Approach to Preventing Child Abuse and it’s an impassioned critical analysis of the church approach and their self-congratulatory and, in some aspects, delusional press release.

In the comments you will see personal stories shared from victims or family members of victims and those stories clearly illustrate why there is such an urgent need for the church to take firm preventative action. It also illustrates why there is a need for us to collect these stories in one place to allow people to see the pervasive impact abuse has on victims and those within their immediate social proximity. People need to understand that these are not rare, isolated cases in the church.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Informed Consent for Bishop’s Interviews

The featured blog post for this week is coming from:

 

The Exponent

Am I not a woman and a sister

 

In her article, April Bennett, outlines suggestions she has for the ecclesiastical interview process based from standard ethical principles that govern research interviews. I have decided to share and highlight this post here because the author suggests that these guidelines be used to implement policy changes for the ecclesiastical–Bishop’s interview–interview process. The suggestions and ideas offered in this post are one of the main components that inspired this blog.

The patriarchal nature of the church has bred a culture that offers temptation for potential and active sexual predators. Now before you go and label me a feminist, which I proudly am, let me first explain how, to me, this is not a women’s only issue. In fact, one of the goals of this blog is to maintain equal consideration for those that could be and have been affected by these interviews. Men, women, and children of all ages are put at risk as soon as that door closes behind them and are left alone with an unquestionable authority figure.

The culture of sexual abuse that lies within the Mormon church stems from, I believe, the ecclesiastical interview process. Leaders within in the church put associated pressure on individuals to turn to their bishops and stake presidents for guidance, support, and repentance. You must first confess your sins in order to receive the blessings and forgiveness that come with the repentance process. If these changes were implemented, members would have an awareness that it is appropriate to question their leaders and that they don’t carry a priesthood authority to do and ask whatever they deem necessary for repentance or otherwise.

Asking the church to implement these ethical safeguards is asking the church to protect its members and its leaders from the harm that can be done to both parties. It is imperative to maintain the perspective from the bishop’s chair. The bishop must also be protected and for those who have enough sense to reason they will not ask sexually invasive questions to any member, not even out of a sense of ecclesiastical duty.

Now, without further ado:

Introducing Informed Consent To Bishop’s Interviews